Even going the least efficient route possible, of just shoving a PS3 into the PS5 the PS3 is all old tech that is far cheaper than it was when it was new. I suppose you actually do believe your rubbish of a 1000 dollar machine that is 50% larger just to have PS3 support, but that seems ludicrous to me. Is it so hard to see how that would be nice? But I have a nice sized collection of PS3 games that I own already and would like to have been able to simply play and enjoy on the same device alongside newer PS4 and eventually PS5 titles. To answer your question about PS3 titles, I don't have the list of PS Now stuff in front of me. And Microsoft has completely turned around recently as well, impressing me a lot more than during most of the Xbone early years. I've never been happier with Nintendo's offerings. But as to your "there is no pleasing some people" that's a load of nonsense. Wed 24th Jun Sorry my differing opinion is so offensive to you.I know the PS2* could play PS1 games and the PS3* could play PS2 games, but I think that is from the inclusion of additional hardware and not that the new hardware was compatible with the old software. This may be a unique situation for Sony where the new console is backwards compatible with the previous generation. PS5 version is considered a remaster and needs to be re-purchased or have an upgrade charge.Interesting thing is that the PS5 version will check for the PS4 disk before starting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |